The Prohibition of Non-given Food: A Response to Schlingloff

doi:10.21482/jbs.74..202303.81

All Issue

2023 Vol.74 Preview Page

투고논문

The Prohibition of Non-given Food: A Response to Schlingloff 제공되지 않는 음식의 금지: 슐링로프에 대한 답변: Ven. PANDITA
빤디따 스님; Postgraduate Institute of Pali and Buddhist Studies, University of Kelaniya

켈라니야 대학교 빨리·불교학연구소 대학원

31 March 2023. pp. 81∼105

PDF

Abstract

In this paper, I attempt to derive an interpretation of the Pācittiya rule no. (40) of the Pātimokkha for Buddhist monks from its background narrative; I call this “the narrative interpretation.” This version is different from the version that its canonical commentary gives, which I call “the canonical interpretation.” Then, based on legal logic and textual evidence, I argue that the narrative interpretation actually reflects the original intent of the rule. I also explore another context where the rule is implicitly referred to. Finally, I observe that this rule is a rare case where the background narrative has retained the original intent of the rule, whereas the canonical commentary has lost it. Consequently, I suggest the need to reconsider Oldenberg’s theory, which views the background stories as the youngest layer in the Vinaya.

Keywords

Theravāda Buddhism

Vinaya

Theravāda Vinaya

Sarvāstivādi Vinaya

monasticism

ethics

monastic ethics

이 논문에서 필자는 승려들의 바라제목차(婆羅提木叉, pātimokkha) 가운데 바일제(波逸提, Pācittiya) 40번 규율을 배경 내러티브를 통해서 해석하고자 한다. 나는 이를 ‘내러티브 해석’이라고 부른다. 이 버전은 내가 ‘성전 해석’이라고 부르는 성전의 주석서가 제공하는 버전과는 다르다. 필자는 규율상의 논리와 문헌적 증거를 기반으로 내러티브 해석이 실제로 규율의 원래 의도를 반영한다고 주장한다. 또한 규율이 암시적으로 가리키는 다른 문맥도 살펴본다. 최종적으로 필자는 이 규율이 배경 내러티브가 규율의 원래 의도를 유지하는 반면에 성전의 주석서는 원래 의도를 잃어버린 드문 경우임을 고찰한다. 따라서 배경 이야기를 율장의 가장 새로운 층으로 보는 올덴베르크(Oldenberg)의 이론은 재고의 필요가 있음을 제안한다.

키워드

테라와다 불교

율장

테라와다 율장

설일체유부 율장

승가제도

윤리

승가 윤리

References

◆ 일차 문헌 PRIMARY SOURCES

(The Pali text titles are abbreviated per the Critical Pali Dictionary system.)

AN Aṅguttara-Nikāya, ed. Richard Morris and A. K. Warder, 6 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1958-76.
MN Majjhima-Nikāya, ed. V. Trenckner and Robert Chalmers, 3 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1977-1979.
Pāt The Pātimokkha, ed. William Pruitt. Translated by K. R. Norman, Oxford: The Pali Text Society, 2001.
Sp Samantapāsādikā: Buddhaghosa’s Commentary on the Vinaya Piṭaka, ed. J. Takakusu and M. Nagai, 7 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1966-1982.
Vin Vinaya Piṭaka, ed. Hermann Oldenberg, 5 vols., Oxford: The Pali Text Society, 1982-97.

◆ 이차 문헌 SECONDARY LITERATURE

ANĀLAYO, Bhikkhu. 2011. A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya. 2 vols, Taipei: Dharma Drum.
AONO, Michihiko. 2018. “Preliminary Research on the Dantapoṇasikkhāpada of the Vinayapiṭaka: Focusing on Methods of Food Acquisition Acceptable for Monks.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, vol. 67, no. 1, 464-459. 10.4259/ibk.67.1_464
BODHI, Bhikkhu, tr. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
HORNER, I. B., tr. 1938-66. The Book of the Discipline (Vinaya Piṭaka). 6 vols, Oxford: The Pali Text Society.
NAKAMURA, Hajime. 2002. Gotama Buddha: A Biography Based on the Most Reliable Texts, Translated from Japanese by Gaynor Sekimori. 2 vols, Tokyo: Kosei Pubishing.
ÑĀṆAMOḶI, Bhikkhu, and Bhikkhu Bodhi, tr. 2009. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. 4th ed. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.
PACHOW, W. 2000. A Comparative Study of the Prātimokṣa on the Basis of its Chinese, Tibetan, Sanskrit and Pāḷi Versions. Revised and enlarged edition, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
PANDITA (Burma), Ven. 2015. “Was the Buddha Obliged to Observe the Vinaya Rules?” 3rd Draft, academia.edu, accessed Nov. 28. 2019. https://www.academia.edu/23121332/Was_the_Buddha_Obliged_to_Observe_the_Vinaya_Rules_3rd_draft_.
PREBISH, Charles S. 1994. A Survey of Vinaya Literature. The Dharma Lamp Series 1, Taipei: Jin Luen.
ROSEN, Valentina. 1959. Der Vinayavibhaṅga zum Bhikṣuprātimokṣa der Sarvāstivādins: Sanskritfragmente nebst einer Analyse der chinesischen Übersetzung. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 2, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Accessed Dec. 5. 2019. http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/rosen1959/0007. 10.1515/9783112563144
SCHLINGLOFF, Dieter. 1963. “Zur Interpretation des Prātimokṣasūtra.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, vol. 113, no. 3, 536-551.
ṬHĀNISSARO, Bhikkhu. 2018. Buddhist Monastic Code: The Pātimokkha Rules Translated & Explained. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Valley Center, CA: Metta Forest Monastery, Dec. 15. 2018. Accessed April 15, 2019. https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/Ebooks/TheBuddhistMonasticCode_181215.pdf.
__________. 2019. “The Question of Bhikkhunī Ordination.” In dhammatalks.org. June 6, 2019. Accessed Dec. 2. 2019. https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/Ebooks/TheQuestionofBhikkhuniOrdination_190606.pdf.

Information

Publisher :Korean Association of Buddhist Studies
Publisher(Ko) :불교학연구회
Journal Title :Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
Journal Title(Ko) :불교학연구
Volume : 74
No :0
Pages :81∼105
DOI :https://doi.org/10.21482/jbs.74..202303.81

[1] AN Aṅguttara-Nikāya, ed. Richard Morris and A. K. Warder, 6 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1958-76.

[2] MN Majjhima-Nikāya, ed. V. Trenckner and Robert Chalmers, 3 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1977-1979.

[3] Pāt The Pātimokkha, ed. William Pruitt. Translated by K. R. Norman, Oxford: The Pali Text Society, 2001.

[4] Sp Samantapāsādikā: Buddhaghosa’s Commentary on the Vinaya Piṭaka, ed. J. Takakusu and M. Nagai, 7 vols., London: The Pali Text Society, 1966-1982.

[5] Vin Vinaya Piṭaka, ed. Hermann Oldenberg, 5 vols., Oxford: The Pali Text Society, 1982-97.

[6] ANĀLAYO, Bhikkhu. 2011. A Comparative Study of the Majjhima-nikāya. 2 vols, Taipei: Dharma Drum.

[7] AONO, Michihiko. 2018. “Preliminary Research on the Dantapoṇasikkhāpada of the Vinayapiṭaka: Focusing on Methods of Food Acquisition Acceptable for Monks.” Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies, vol. 67, no. 1, 464-459. 10.4259/ibk.67.1_464

[8] BODHI, Bhikkhu, tr. 2012. The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Translation of the Aṅguttara Nikāya. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.

[9] HORNER, I. B., tr. 1938-66. The Book of the Discipline (Vinaya Piṭaka). 6 vols, Oxford: The Pali Text Society.

[10] NAKAMURA, Hajime. 2002. Gotama Buddha: A Biography Based on the Most Reliable Texts, Translated from Japanese by Gaynor Sekimori. 2 vols, Tokyo: Kosei Pubishing.

[11] ÑĀṆAMOḶI, Bhikkhu, and Bhikkhu Bodhi, tr. 2009. The Middle Length Discourses of the Buddha: A New Translation of the Majjhima Nikāya. 4th ed. Somerville, MA: Wisdom Publications.

[12] PACHOW, W. 2000. A Comparative Study of the Prātimokṣa on the Basis of its Chinese, Tibetan, Sanskrit and Pāḷi Versions. Revised and enlarged edition, Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

[13] PANDITA (Burma), Ven. 2015. “Was the Buddha Obliged to Observe the Vinaya Rules?” 3rd Draft, academia.edu, accessed Nov. 28. 2019. https://www.academia.edu/23121332/Was_the_Buddha_Obliged_to_Observe_the_Vinaya_Rules_3rd_draft_.

[14] PREBISH, Charles S. 1994. A Survey of Vinaya Literature. The Dharma Lamp Series 1, Taipei: Jin Luen.

[15] ROSEN, Valentina. 1959. Der Vinayavibhaṅga zum Bhikṣuprātimokṣa der Sarvāstivādins: Sanskritfragmente nebst einer Analyse der chinesischen Übersetzung. Sanskrittexte aus den Turfanfunden 2, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Accessed Dec. 5. 2019. http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/rosen1959/0007. 10.1515/9783112563144

[16] SCHLINGLOFF, Dieter. 1963. “Zur Interpretation des Prātimokṣasūtra.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, vol. 113, no. 3, 536-551.

[17] ṬHĀNISSARO, Bhikkhu. 2018. Buddhist Monastic Code: The Pātimokkha Rules Translated & Explained. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Valley Center, CA: Metta Forest Monastery, Dec. 15. 2018. Accessed April 15, 2019. https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/Ebooks/TheBuddhistMonasticCode_181215.pdf.

[18] __________. 2019. “The Question of Bhikkhunī Ordination.” In dhammatalks.org. June 6, 2019. Accessed Dec. 2. 2019. https://www.dhammatalks.org/Archive/Writings/Ebooks/TheQuestionofBhikkhuniOrdination_190606.pdf.

Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies ISSN:1598-0642(Print) 불교학연구

All Issue